I was wondering how it is acceptable for the Ahmadiyya movement with not considering Prophet Muhammad the last prophet when that seems to be so central to Islam? I thought the belief that Prophet Muhammad was the last prophet was one of the five pillars? I am looking for scripture references from the Ahmadiyya movement that helps me understand how they justify it. Did the question never come up? I am not looking for answers that indicate why the Ahmadiyya movement is blasphemous, incorrect, or non-Islamic.

Asalamoalikum ! I want to know more about Why Ahmadiya are considered Non-Muslims? Can someone please provide me with extensive detail? JazakAllah:)

The immediate offspring of Adam, Seth, was a prophet. Ibrahim had Ismail and Isaac as sons and prophets. Isaac had Yaqub and Yaqub had Yusuf. Dawud had Sulayman. From the progeny of Ismail bin Ibrahim we have Muhammad. (Peace be upon them ) The offspring or progeny of Mirza Ghulam Ahmed the Ahmadiyyah prophet aren't considered prophets but caliphs. Why is this distinction made? Given that he had 2 sons who reached adulthood and he was paternal grandfather to boys.

99.9% of the time, whenever Muslims are confronted with questions like 'Will Islamic God send Hindus, e.g, to Islamic Paradise', their response is, 'Allah will forgive every sin except Shirk', and how every Muslim will be taken out of hellfire eventually, as Allah will forgive every sin except Shirk. Ahmadis don't commit Shirk so according to the Quran, they will be forgiven as Allah will forgive every sin except Shirk? Now, I know, ofcourse you will have your own conclusions and you will never accept this but pls answer this question having this Quranic verse and Hadith in mind: > Surely Allah does not forgive that anything should be associated with > Him, and forgives what is besides that to whomsoever He pleases; and > whoever associates anything with Allah, he devises indeed a great sin. [[4:48]][1] > > When the people of Paradise will enter Paradise and the people of Hell > will go to Hell, Allah will order those who have had faith equal to > the weight of a grain of mustard seed to be taken out from Hell. [[Bukhari 22]][2] > (Believing Allah as your God is for sure more than a mustard of faith) Pls don't come up with 'All the Muslims are unanimously agreed that Ahmadis are not Muslims' and you can't go against the Ijma! If that is the case, Ibn Taymiyyah (who went against the Ijma in many things e.g the Talaq Issue), or Salafis of today are going to hellfire as they rejected many things on which there was Ijma.. Thanks.

In comments on another question , System Down says "the rest of the Muslims believe that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's claims are false, and that he is a false claimant to prophethood" and links to a table in Wikipedia . I'd like to hear a more thorough answer. Why do Sunni Muslims consider Ahmadiyya beliefs false, and why do they consider the aberrations so severe that they exclude them from even being called Muslims?

I heard from an Ahmadi (sect) person that once the prophet went to a village. His followers told him there is a really pretty woman who lives here. The prophet contracted Mut'ah marriage with her for the night and left the next day. He said it was common in those days in Islam. My question is: Did Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him) ever contract Muta'h (temporary) marriage? Is the above story true?

There are around 10-20 million Ahmadiyyas in the world. What made people follow the founder of the Ahmadiyya movement, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad? If a person randomly says that he is the Messiah, no one will believe him so what made Ahmadiyyas follow Mirza Ghulam Ahmad?