Buddhism
Q&A for people practicing or interested in Buddhist philosophy, teaching, and practice
Latest Questions
1
votes
3
answers
73
views
How to explain the concept of "body" as in "rupakaya" in intuitive terms?
I am looking at [Rupakaya on the Rigpa Wiki](https://www.rigpawiki.org/index.php?title=Rupakaya), and it says: > [It] refers to the two 'form kayas' of a buddha: nirmanakaya and sambhogakaya. It is said that the rupakaya arises from the accumulation of merit and the dharmakaya from the accumulation...
I am looking at [Rupakaya on the Rigpa Wiki](https://www.rigpawiki.org/index.php?title=Rupakaya) , and it says:
> [It] refers to the two 'form kayas' of a buddha: nirmanakaya and sambhogakaya. It is said that the rupakaya arises from the accumulation of merit and the dharmakaya from the accumulation of wisdom.
Using the term "body" confuses me, like the [Dharmakaya](https://www.rigpawiki.org/index.php?title=Dharmakaya) , the "Absolute or Truth Body". How can truth have a body? Can you explain how this works in an intuitive way?
Lance Pollard
(760 rep)
May 2, 2024, 03:33 AM
• Last activity: May 3, 2024, 11:54 AM
0
votes
3
answers
110
views
Where/how do Snp 5.7 & 15 prove kāya in meditation context is rūpa-kāya by default?
I read the following in [this answer](https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/a/49852/254): > Snp 5 is a great example in usage that proves kāya in meditation > context is rūpa-kāya by default. > > https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2021/10/kn-snp-5-buddha-knew-about-ambiguities.html [Snp 5.7](https:/...
I read the following in [this answer](https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/a/49852/254) :
> Snp 5 is a great example in usage that proves kāya in meditation
> context is rūpa-kāya by default.
>
> https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2021/10/kn-snp-5-buddha-knew-about-ambiguities.html
[Snp 5.7](https://suttacentral.net/snp5.7/en/sujato?lang=en&layout=linebyline&reference=none¬es=none&highlight=false&script=latin) says, per Sujato translation:
> “As a flame tossed by a gust of wind,”
>
> “Accī yathā vātavegena khittā,
>
> replied the Buddha,
>
> (upasīvāti bhagavā)
>
> “comes to an end beyond reckoning;
>
> Atthaṁ paleti na upeti saṅkhaṁ;
>
> so too, a sage freed from mental **phenomena**
>
> Evaṁ munī nāma**kāyā** vimutto,
>
> comes to an end beyond reckoning.”
>
> Atthaṁ paleti na upeti saṅkhaṁ”.
>
> I ask the Sakyan about knowledge for them;
>
> Ñāṇaṁ sakkānupucchāmi,
>
> how should one like that be guided?”
>
> kathaṁ neyyo tathāvidho”.
[Snp 5.15](https://suttacentral.net/snp5.15/en/sujato?lang=en&layout=linebyline&reference=none¬es=none&highlight=false&script=latin) says, per Sujato translation:
> said Venerable Posāla [to the Buddha],
>
>(iccāyasmā posālo)
>
>Consider one who perceives the disappearance of **form**,
>
> Vibhūta**rūpa**saññissa,
>
> who has entirely given up **the body**,
>
> sabba**kāya**ppahāyino;
>
> and who **sees nothing** at all
>
> Ajjhattañca bahiddhā ca,
>
> internally and externally.
>
> **natthi** kiñcīti **passato**;
>
>.........
>
>“Viññāṇaṭṭhitiyo sabbā,
>
>said the Buddha,
>
>(posālāti bhagavā)
>
> “all the planes of consciousness.
>
> Abhijānaṁ tathāgato;
>
> And he knows this one who remains,
>
> Tiṭṭhantamenaṁ jānāti,
>
> committed to that as their final goal.
>
> Vimuttaṁ tapparāyaṇaṁ.
>
> Understanding that desire for rebirth [**coming to be**]
>
> **Ākiñcaññasambhavaṁ** ñatvā,
>
> **in the dimension of nothingness** is a fetter,
>
> Nandī saṁyojanaṁ iti;
Where/how do Snp 5.7 & 15 prove kāya in meditation context is rūpa-kāya by default?
Paraloka Dhamma Dhatu
(45860 rep)
Nov 19, 2023, 12:21 PM
• Last activity: Dec 21, 2023, 12:01 PM
Showing page 1 of 2 total questions