If Man creates art in paintings and sculptures, etc, which are depictions of the natural world such as landscapes flora and fauna, life itself and man accepts and qualifies this to be art.
Is the subject of this art, itself art?
Or is it just man's depiction of the world in painting etc, art, and the natural world is not art?
The proposition that the natural world is not art seems absurd to me.
Is it necessary that the natural world needs an artist, such as paintings and sculptures need an artist?
Is the artist of the natural world God?
If Art is a subjective, and an opinion, and there is no consensus of agreement between everybody with regard to there being objective definition of Art, is anybodies definition of art and there examples of this definition of art, not a depiction of the natural world?
I wondered if there was a christian perspective within the bible or there are Christian apologetics that would concur with my argument?
Or is it flawed?
Asked by user63817
Jun 4, 2024, 08:29 PM
Last activity: Jun 18, 2024, 05:51 PM
Last activity: Jun 18, 2024, 05:51 PM