This may seem like a strange question at first, since well, we can literally see that the Qur'an is a book:
And we often refer to it as a book. And the Qur'an refers to itself as a book (Qur'an 5:15 : "...There has come to you from Allah a light and a clear Book."). However, it doesn't seem that straightforward:
- القرآن al-Qurʾān means "the recitation" (Wikipedia ), which suggests the sequence of words in the Qur'an is what makes it the Qur'an, not the medium on which it's written,
- the Qur'an was transmitted through "oral memorization and recitation" (see: https://islam.stackexchange.com/q/28370/17163) , i.e., the Qur'an existed before it was in book format, and
- I have the Qur'an on my computer in pdf format; we don't likewise call the Qur'an e.g. the "holy pdf" of Islam.
**Question**: Is it technically correct to refer to the Qur'an as a book?
This is a bit of a philosophical question: identifying the essence of the Qur'an, that which if we took it away, we would no longer have a Qur'an.
----
*Update* (or: what I've learned since I first posted this question):
- Another question highlights that the word *kitab* (کتاب), which means "book ", is used in Qur'an 2:2 to refer to itself https://islam.stackexchange.com/q/14927/17163
- III-AK-III writes the *Qur'an did not, does not, and will not rely on manuscripts* in an answer to https://islam.stackexchange.com/q/46748/17163 This answer quotes the ayah:
> Rather, the Qur'an is distinct verses [preserved] within the breasts of those who have been given knowledge. And none reject Our verses except the wrongdoers.
> Qur'an 29:49
- Wikipedia writes: When referring to the physical bound volume, some use the term *mus'haf* (مصحف).

Asked by Rebecca J. Stones
(20998 rep)
Apr 7, 2017, 03:06 PM
Last activity: May 2, 2024, 10:24 AM
Last activity: May 2, 2024, 10:24 AM