Edit: The proposed duplicate cannot possibly be a duplicate, because I attempted to clarify the answer to this question in the proposed duplicate's comments, but was told to ask another official question.
-----------------------------------------------
[This answer](https://christianity.stackexchange.com/a/89637/56378) follows temporal logic to reason that the Real Presence in the Eucharist is logically impossible:
>Logically, it would be impossible for Jesus to be holding in his hand a piece of bread that had become his broken, sacrificial body, prior to that body having died in sacrifice.
This is a defense of the statement [here](https://normangeisler.com/does-the-nt-support-the-rc-view-of-communion/) by [Norman Geisler](http://normangeisler.com/about/) :
>It is not *possible* since Jesus would be holding himself in his own hand (when He said, “this is my body”).
We know that Jesus is not bound by the physics that would prevent a man from walking on water (Matthew 14:25).
Who teaches, and where can one find a defense, that Jesus is bound by the physics of time?
Asked by qxn
(504 rep)
Feb 15, 2022, 08:36 PM
Last activity: Dec 5, 2022, 12:01 AM
Last activity: Dec 5, 2022, 12:01 AM