Are there sola scriptura inerrantists who reject sensus unum as a general hermeneutic?

I have noticed that adherers to *sola scriptura* that defend biblical inerrancy nearly always argue from a *sensus unum* understanding of scripture as opposed to a *sensus plenior* understanding of scripture. Those who argue for a *sensus unum* will say that a *sensus plenior* contradicts biblical inerrancy. **Are there any schools of Reformed thought (liberal or otherwise) which have rejected the *sensus unum* view and yet still affirm biblical inerrancy from a view of *sensus plenior*?** Or for that matter, are there any Reformed persons who argue for such a position?