Have any Wesleyan theologians compared Outler's Quadrilateral to PaRDeS?

In 1964, Methodist theologian Albert C. Outler outlined the [Wesleyan Quadrilateral](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wesleyan_Quadrilateral) in his introduction to John Wesley's anthology of works. This establishes a hermeneutic framework in which truth, revelation and so forth are interpreted through the lenses of Scripture and Tradition, reason and Experience. Similarly, Jewish Scholarship has a similar framework, [PaRDeS,](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pardes_(Jewish_exegesis)#Remez) an acronym formed from the following hermeneutic approaches: > * Peshat (פְּשָׁט‎) — "surface" ("straight") or the literal (direct) meaning. > * Remez (רֶמֶז‎) — "hints" or the deep (allegoric: hidden or symbolic) meaning beyond just the literal sense. > * Derash (דְּרַשׁ‎) — from Hebrew darash: "inquire" ("seek") — the comparative (midrashic) meaning, as given through similar occurrences. > * Sod (סוֹד‎) (pronounced with a long O as in 'soda') — "secret" ("mystery") or the esoteric/mystical meaning, as given through inspiration or revelation. Have there been any Weslyan theologians and scholars that have sought to compare and equate the two frameworks and methodologies.