How is the ‘Resurrection of the Holy Ones’ in Mt.27:51-53 understood by those who consider it a literal, historical event?

This question is very similar to a question I just asked, but it's not a duplicate (just hear me out). Since there are many ways to read the Bible, I wanted to understand multiple points of view, that being: 1) those who understand this as a non-literal, non-historical event (modern, liberal scholars, perhaps) -- the previous question ; 2) those who interpret the events as literal, specifically the pericope of the Resurrection of the Holy Ones as cited in Matthew's Passion narrative specifically -- this question. Of course, the main body of the question will be similar, but I wanted to direct the question towards a different audience and provide a venue for that. There are also a variety of other questions geared for those who interpret it as literal. The scripture of focus is: > And, behold, the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to > the bottom; and the earth did quake, and the rocks rent; And the > graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose, > And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the > holy city, and appeared unto many. Now when the centurion, and they > that were with him, watching Jesus, saw the earthquake, and those > things that were done, they feared greatly, saying, Truly this was the > Son of God. (Matthew 27:51-54. KJV) With phenomenal events such as an earthquake so mighty it opens a number of graves and then the righteous dead arise and interact with the community, one would expect Matthew to explicate these miracles beyond the pithy lines in his text; or, at least, expect the other evangelists to also document these incidences in their narratives. The Markan narrative denotes the temple’s rented veil and the centurion’s response, but does not make any mention of an earthquake or the resurrection of saints. Similarly, Luke and John do not make even the slightest reference to these events. Additionally, during Peter’s pontifical address during Pentecost, not even a nebulous reference to a powerful earthquake or the resurrection of these saints is conveyed. Pentecost occurred fifty days following Christ’s resurrection and the supposed Holy Ones’ appearance to “many.” Therefore, the omission of these events in Peter’s address, especially to an audience that were likely witnesses to these events, is a curious oversight. Why didn't the other Gospel writers write about these? Why aren't there other extra-biblical sources for these events? It seems like more than Christ's followers would have witnessed these events.... And it certainly seems like something people would continue to talk about for ages thereafter... Are there other sources that may imply the opening of tombs and rising of the deceased? Or were only the righteous ones able to "see" these? Or is it that there weren't that many "righteous" individuals in the scheme of things -- that it was hardly noticed? Or that the resurrected beings, looked just like everyone else? Or did the High Priest somehow cover-up this story? (For instance, we read that they tried telling people that Christ's body was stolen). Or did they just destroy all the records they could get their hands on? (and the general witness to these events were illiterate)? Or we simply have not unearthed these records yet? After all, an absence of evidence is not evidence for something, right? Just confused why no one else mentions it. (Please correct me if I'm wrong!) Also, do we have any archaeological records of tombs breaking open? And does the geological record correspond to an earthquake happening in this region? ***If you are interested as to a non-literal, modern interpretation, please see my other question for the answer provided there.