Are there prominent textual criticism books defending the faithful preservation of the gospels in modern Bibles compared to the original manuscripts?

Numerous skeptics assert that modern Bibles are the result of a succession of copies of copies of copies of copies, implying that across centuries of transcription, translation, and interpretation, or possibly due to motivations to promote certain narratives, the original text might have been altered, distorted, or even lost. This skepticism arises from concerns regarding the reliability and accuracy of ancient manuscripts, as well as the methodologies employed in their preservation and transmission over time. In the context of defending the historicity of the resurrection of Jesus, particularly focusing on the gospels, are there any renowned books that challenge this skepticism? Do they provide arguments for the faithful preservation of the four gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John) in our modern Bibles compared to the manuscripts originally penned by the gospel authors? --- **Note**. This question follows up on previous questions I have recently asked: https://christianity.stackexchange.com/q/101169/61679 https://christianity.stackexchange.com/q/101109/61679