presuppositional apologetics

Well, recently I've been trying to better understand the different apologetics approaches, but am having a hard time understanding the presuppositional apologetics standpoint. I've heard several apologists claim that the book of Acts shows the apostles using evidentialist apologetics, and that even Jesus used a form of evidence based apologetics by using miracles to persuade people of his divinity. They use this as an argument against presuppositionalism. I was simply wondering how someone of the presuppositonal persuasion would respond to this argument.