From M43 the Mahavedalla Sutta:
> It is said consciousness. Friend, what is consciousness?: It knows,
> therefore it is called consciousness. Knows what? Knows this is
> pleasant, this is unpleasant and knows this is neither unpleasant nor
> pleasant. Knows therefore it is said conscious. Friend, this knowledge
> and this consciousness, are they associated or dissociated? Is there a
> method to differentiate them and show them apart? What is known is
> consciousness and consciousness is knowledge. Therefore these things
> are associated and not dissociated and it is not possible to
> differentiate them and show them apart.
then later:
> Friend, this feeling, perception, and this consciousness, are these
> associated or dissociated? Is it possible to differenciate them and
> show them apart?: Friend, feelings, perceptions and consciousness are
> associated and not dissociated and it is not possible to differentiate
> them and show them apart: Friend, the felt is perceived, and the
> perceived is consciously known Therefore these things are associated
> and not dissociated and it is not possible to differenciate them and
> show them apart.
If these three - consciousness, perception, and feeling - cannot be told apart, how are they conceptualized separately in the first place? It's a contradiction. If they cannot be told apart, why bother listing them as 3 separate aggregates? Why not just say the three arise together?
Asked by nacre
(1901 rep)
Mar 15, 2023, 12:20 AM
Last activity: Apr 26, 2023, 01:18 AM
Last activity: Apr 26, 2023, 01:18 AM