When Paul wrote about Jesus' birth as "born of a woman," did he not contradict the fact that Jesus was "born of a virgin" as Matthew wrote?

According to the Scriptures that were given through Matthew, Jesus Christ was born to a virgin. > "All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had said through the > prophet: 23 “The virgin will conceive and give birth to a son, and > they will call him Immanuel”[g] (which means “God with us”)" > (Matthew.1:22-23) However, the Scriptures that were given through the apostle Paul mention that Jesus was born of a woman. > "4 But when the set time had fully come, God sent his Son, born of a > woman, born under the law, 5 to redeem those under the law, that we > might receive adoption to sonship.[b]" (Galatians.4:4-5) Scriptures do not contradict. But the above two messages seem to contradict with each other. If they do not truly contradict with each other then how can they be reconciled?