Have any critiques of Lindbeck's principles been offered by academics?

[George Lindbeck](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Lindbeck) 's principles for doing 'good' Christology are as follows: 1. Monotheism - There is only one God 2. Historic Specificity - Centred on Jesus of Nazareth 3. Christological Maximalism - all highest possible significance should be attributed to Him If we use these principles when talking about Christ we will have a 'good Christology.' Are there any known critiques of these principles as offered by other theologians?