Does "Jesus Christ" come from "Hesus Krishna"?

I read this article entitled: [Jesus H. Christ = Hesus Horus Krishna.](http://www.sabbathcovenant.com/doctrine/hesus_krishna.htm) > At the end of that time, Constantine returned to the gathering to > discover that the presbyters had not agreed on a new deity but had > balloted down to a shortlist of five prospects: Caesar, Krishna, > Mithra, Horus and Zeus (Historia Ecclesiastica, Eusebius, c. 325). > Constantine was the ruling spirit at Nicaea and he ultimately decided > upon a new god for them. To involve British factions, he ruled that > the name of the great Druid god, Hesus, be joined with the Eastern > Saviour-god, Krishna (Krishna is Sanskrit for Christ), and thus Hesus > Krishna would be the official name of the new Roman god. A vote was > taken and it was with a majority show of hands (161 votes to 157) that > both divinities became one God. Following longstanding heathen custom, > Constantine used the official gathering and the Roman apotheosis > decree to legally deify two deities as one, and did so by democratic > consent. A new god was proclaimed and "officially" ratified by > Constantine (Acta Concilii Nicaeni, 1618). That purely political act > of deification effectively and legally placed Hesus and Krishna among > the Roman gods as one individual composite. That abstraction lent > Earthly existence to amalgamated doctrines for the Empire's new > religion; and because there was no letter "J" in alphabets until > around the ninth century, the name subsequently evolved into "Jesus > Christ". Is there any historical basis for this claim at all?