In contemporary society (apart from religion) sex is mostly seen as something pleasurable, which is done even without considering childbearing.
As far as I can see, Buddha taught extensively to lay people how to treat each other friendly & compassionately, but omitted the bodily intimacy aspect of it.
It's largely sensual desire that binds human couples together, and I am not merely referring to appearance, but also the craving to be touched etc. (as it's always correctly pointed out in the suttas: Pleasant feelings at the 5 sense doors)
Q1: Did the Buddha remain silent on these matters because of a specific reason?
Q1.1Was the Buddha even concerned about sexual objectification & did he suggested perhaps sexual repression?
Dhammapda 242 states:
>Unchastity is the taint in a woman
Q2: Could it be that a majority of Buddha's teaching are timeless, but few are open for change, due to different societal context etc.? (e.g., 3rd precept)
Q3: In the above quote, isn't it a bit biased to state that it's ONLY a woman's taint? Why not a man? Why focus overly on women?
Back in those days, there were probably fixed gender roles, but I believe society should progress & should rather acknowledge individuality even among the genders. It seems that the Buddha is over-generalizing, or did the miss the boat?
Asked by F2TF
(11 rep)
Dec 23, 2019, 01:22 PM
Last activity: Sep 8, 2023, 01:34 AM
Last activity: Sep 8, 2023, 01:34 AM