Do the suttas say the "old kamma" of an Arahant continues to fruit?

I read the following on the internet: > But when the view of "self" ends, kamma also ends Is that plausible? > Are you saying that kamma is conditioned by self-view? And saying that > kamma -- the fruit of old kamma and the creation of new kamma -- is > non-existent for a stream-enterer (who by definition has no > self-view)?? **I thought it was, canonically, an attribute of an arahant > -- even then old kamma continues to fruit, but no new kamma is created** -- it's conditioned not by self-view but by ... by conceit, and by desire-for-existence, that kind of thing ... isn't that **the doctrine > of the suttas**? Do the suttas say the "old kamma" of an Arahant continues to fruit?