What is the difference between Sakkaya Ditthi and Attanuditthi?

What is the difference between Sakkhya Ditthi and Attanuditthi? I have asked the same question at the Dhamma Wheel topic: [Sakkaya Ditthi is not self-view!!](https://dhammawheel.com/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=31361) --- In my opinion or view, SN 35.166 (Samyutta 34.16.11.(166)) says Sakkāya Ditthi - Self View is not the self view but it is taking this existence or five aggregate as pleasurable. > *34. 16. 11.* > > *(166) Sakkāya - Self View* > > *1. At one time the Blessed One lived in Jīvaka's mango orchard in Rajagaha.* > > *2. Then a certain monk approached the Blessed One, worshipped and sat on a side.* > > *3. Sitting on a side that monk said to the Blessed One: “Venerable sir, knowing how and seeing how does the self view get dispelled?”* > > *4-9. “Monk, by knowing and seeing unpleasantness, in the eye self view gets dispelled Monk, by knowing and seeing unpleasantness in > forms, eye-consciousness, eye-contact and whatever feelings pleasant, > unpleasant or neither unpleasant nor pleasant born of eye-contact, > self view gets dispelled. Repeat for ear, nose, tongue, body, and > mind* > > *10. “Monk, knowing and seeing thus self view gets dispelled.”* In my view or opinion, taking: - Anicca (the impermanent) as Nicca (permanent) is wrong view ie: Micchaditthi - Dukkha (the unsatisfactory) as Adhukha (happiness) is Sakkayaditthi - Anatta (not-self) as Atta (self) is Attanuditthi.