Changing of questions and the precept of not speaking what is not true

Venerables, Upasaka, Upasika Valued readers and engaged Buddhabodhisattas here, - In how far might it count as a break of the precept, abstaining from telling what is not true, if one changes the circumstances? For example here: - There might be a question, receiving answers. Afterwards are changes of the questions, sometime seemingly slight, does a change counts as a break? - If not having the intention to missinterpret the answerer, does such anyhow possible give ground that they accure missinterpreted? To include Abhidhamma aspects: - What are ones reasons willing to change answers, questions, delete parts, modify... afterwards if it is unskillful? Why and how could one modify, delete, change in a skilfulway that would harm in this or that way? - How to go beyound such problems, what whould be a secure solution? - What are the consequences of missinterpreting and changing the true or circumstances to display a differnt picture for ones benefit, harm of others or out of not-knowing and fear (e.g. the four roots of akusala, greed, aversion, delution, fear)? - How do you practice that, or exerianced the matter in you practice in forums and blogs? Note that it is a general question, but also a very urged matter of all editors and edits here, yet so importand and on topic of practicing Dhamma, that it should not be taken as meta. *(This question is a gift of Dhamma and not meant for commercial purposes or other wordily gains.)* >*Side note in regard of Bu-meta*: it might be good if the moderators engage on this maater in regard of: 1. Make use of "on hold" and possible protection of question and or notification of answerers in cases of question changes. My person can not engage there, just with hints in comments, not sure if the old question there still exists.